Legal Opinion
Cook v. Hairston
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 4, 1990No. C-1-89-0066PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by all parties. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52, the Court does hereby set forth its Findings of Fact, Opinion, and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1) Plaintiffs Claudie Cook and Erma Schaefer are elderly residents of nursing homes in Hamilton County, Ohio. Both are handicapped individuals as that term is defined in 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794.
2) At the time of the filing of this action, plaintiffs Iona and Morrow Snider were elderly residents of nursing homes in Warren County, Ohio. Both were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- JORDANO BY AND THROUGH JORDANO v. SteffenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Jordano ex rel. Jordano v. SteffenDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992