Legal Opinion

Hill v. North America Accident Ins.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 28, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Reversing.

On the first appeal of this case the judgment was reversed, (1) because of the introduction of incompetent evidence over the objection of the insurance company; (2) because there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict which on that trial was for $2,500, the full amount of the policy. (Hill’s Admr. v. North America Accident Insurance Company, 182 Ky. 125).

On the second trial the incompetent evidence complained of was not offered, and that objection is not now presented, but the trial court sustained a motion made by the insurance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. North American Accident Insurance v. Hill's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horn's Administrator v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Chesapeake Ohio Railway Company v. HayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. EisemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. HayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API