Legal Opinion

Zeitlin v. Wetenhall

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 23, 2023No. 1:20-cv-01067Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION ERIC ZEITLIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01067-CL Plaintiff, Vv. OPINION AND ORDER NATALIE M. WETENHALL, Defendant. CLARKE, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Eric Zeitlin brings this action against Defendant Natalie Wetenhall for alleged legal malpractice. Jurisdiction is proper in federal court pursuant to

28 USC § 1332

because there is diversity of citizenship between the parties and the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000.00. Full consent to magistrate jurisdiction was entered on December 2, 2022 (#45). The case comes…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Allen v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API