Legal Opinion · Dissent

Owensboro National Bank v. Stephens

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 29, 1994No. Nos. 92-6330, 92-6331Published

1DissentBatchelder, Circuit Judge

I disagree with the majority’s decision affirming the district court in granting summary judgment and injunctive relief for the plaintiffs. Therefore, I respectfully dissent from the Court’s opinion.

I

Defendants-Appellants present three central arguments in this appeal: (1) that Kentucky Revised Code § 287.030(4) (“section 287”) is not preempted by 12 U.S.C. § 92 under traditional preemption analysis; (2) that the McCarran-Ferguson Act protects section 287 from preemption by § 92; and (3) that section 287 cannot be preempted by § 92 because of language contained in the Bank Holding Company Act…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API