Owensboro National Bank v. Stephens
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentBatchelder, Circuit Judge
I disagree with the majority’s decision affirming the district court in granting summary judgment and injunctive relief for the plaintiffs. Therefore, I respectfully dissent from the Court’s opinion.
I
Defendants-Appellants present three central arguments in this appeal: (1) that Kentucky Revised Code § 287.030(4) (“section 287”) is not preempted by 12 U.S.C. § 92 under traditional preemption analysis; (2) that the McCarran-Ferguson Act protects section 287 from preemption by § 92; and (3) that section 287 cannot be preempted by § 92 because of language contained in the Bank Holding Company Act…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Group Life & Health Insurance v. Royal Drug Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.