Legal Opinion

Gornick v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided June 11, 1997No. 06-96-00106-CRPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Brian Gornick was convicted of criminal trespass 1 onto the property of Sarah Armstrong. Trial was to a jury. Gornick contends in his second point of error that the trial court erred in denying his request to instruct the jury on his defensive theory. We agree and will reverse and remand for a new trial. Because we find this issue disposi-tive, we do not reach Gornick’s remaining points of error.

Gorniek’s conviction is the latest incident in a long running dispute between Sarah Armstrong and Gornick regarding the true boundary between their adjacent properties.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. LaPoint v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Loun v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  2. Thieu Quang Bui v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  3. Blumenstetter v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Hill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. Skeen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API