Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Wright
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 3, 2002No. 1001181PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant, Motis Franklin Wright, was convicted of first-degree robbery and was sentenced under the Habitual Felony Offender Act to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. Acting pro se, Wright filed a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition complaining that the indictments in his cases were void, and the trial court denied the petition. Wright appealed the denial, and the Court of Criminal Appeals dismissed his appeal for untimeliness, without an opinion. Wright v. State, (No. CR-00-1073, March 1, 2001) 821 So.2d 1047 (Ala.Crim.App. 2001) (table). The Court of Criminal Appeals…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Smith v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sealy, L.L.C. v. BanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Loggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Mark Allen Jenkins v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Mashburn v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.