Praggastis v. Clackamas County
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The question we address is whether a county will be protected by judicial immunity when the county is sued under the Oregon Tort Claims Act (OTCA), ORS 30.260 to 30.300, for the alleged negligence of an employee of the county clerk’s office, serving as a clerk of the circuit court, when the clerk does not docket a dissolution decree incorporating a property settlement agreement because of existing instructions from the presiding judge of the county.
Plaintiff alleged that: “Defendant, acting through its agents and employees in the course and scope of their business, entered the decree…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tennyson v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Fossen v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Westfall v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Franke v. Oregon Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Fay v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.