Legal Opinion

Tennyson v. Children's Services Division

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1989No. TC A8502-01202; CA A40413; SC S35715, S35716PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This action concerns claims for federal civil rights violations and for negligence arising from a decision by child protection workers to remove a child from her home and to initiate a proceeding in juvenile court. The central issue concerns the nature of the immunity to which the individual defendants are entitled under 42 USC section 1983 (1982).

Plaintiffs are Michael Tennyson (Father) and Colleen Tennyson (Mother), the parents of Shannon Tennyson. Shannon Tennyson was five years old during the events at issue in this case. Defendants are the Children’s Services Division (CSD), a division…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Babcock v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Beason v. HarcleroadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Franke v. Oregon Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Harmon v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API