Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Silver

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1906No. 14,793PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Wyandotte court of common pleas; William G. Holt, judge.

1Per curiam

The city of Kansas City undertook to pave one of its streets and. to assess the cost upon the property specially benefited. The defendants in error enjoined the assessments against their property, the original petition for the improvement having lacked the required number of signatures. The legislature then passed the general curative act embodied in section 129 of chapter 122, Laws of 1903, which reads as follows:

“In case the mayor and council of any city shall have heretofore levied or shall hereafter levy any special assessment for any public improvement in said city, which special…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SmileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. City of Newton v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Hines v. City of LeavenworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  4. City of Emporia v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. City of Kansas v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. SllvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cowart v. Union Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Mason v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Shepherd v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. City of Bartlesville v. KeelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API