Legal Opinion
Rydberg v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 13, 1951No. Civ. Nos. 2051, 2052PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek money judgment for vacation rights under the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940.1 The motion to dismiss in each case is made on the ground that the complaint fails to- state a claim, upon which relief can be granted. The pleadings and motions warranted consolidation. The motions are based on Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. -
Counsel for.each party filed briefs and argued orally. Defendant, in support of the motions, contends the relief sought by plaintiffs is not within the purview of said Act, citing cases.2…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sparks v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Siaskiewicz v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Dwyer v. Crosby Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- MacLaughlin v. Union Switch & Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saleck v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
- Messina v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1970