Legal Opinion
Minatsis v. Brown
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 1, 1989No. C-2-87-627PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, contending that section 204(h) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, as amended by the Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments of 1986, codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1154(h), is unconstitutional on its face and as applied. This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss.
The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff Ioannis Minatsis, a Canadian citizen, entered the United States as a visitor on May 10, 1983. He married Irini Hiotis, a United States citizen, on July…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Tourtellot v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Renegade Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Barmo v. RenoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Greenleaf Apartments, Ltd. v. Soltesz (In Re Greenleaf Apartments, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
- Blackwell v. ThornburghDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.