Legal Opinion
Henault Mining Company v. Tysk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1970No. 22545_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
419 F.2d 766
HENAULT MINING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Harold TYSK, individually and as Montana State Director of the Bureau of Land Management, and Stewart L. Udall, individually and as Secretary of the Interior, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 22545.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
November 14, 1969.
Rehearing Denied January 23, 1970.
Roger P. Marquis (argued), Clyde O. Martz, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raymond N. Zagone, Atty., Washington, D. C., Moody Brickett, U. S. Atty., Clifford E. Schleusner, Asst. U. S. Atty., Billings, Mont., for appellants.
Charles E. Carrell (argued), of Carrell &…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Henault Mining Co. v. TyskCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Henault Mining Co. v. TyskDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967