Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided August 1, 1995No. 90-1446PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IVERS, Judge:

This matter is before the Court on the appellant’s application for an award of reasonable attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The Court will grant the appellant’s application and order the award of attorney fees and expenses consistent with this opinion.

I. FACTS

This Court, in a memorandum decision dated August 16, 1993, (1) vacated the decision of the BVA as to the denial of service connection for a right elbow disability because the appellant had not submitted new and material evidence for reopening the claim; (2) dismissed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  4. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Colvin v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shaw v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
  2. Vidal v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
  3. In re Fee Agreement of MasonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  4. Sandoval v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
  5. Shannon D. Smith, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API