Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2019No. 17-11301PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:

Michael Angelo Ortiz pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm and ammunition as a convicted felon. On appeal, he argues that the factual basis supporting his plea was insufficient. We disagree. The factual basis demonstrated that Ortiz's conduct satisfied all elements of the offense. Accordingly, *870 we affirm the district court's acceptance of his guilty plea.

I. Proceedings

In June 2017, a grand jury indicted Michael Angelo Ortiz on one count: possessing a firearm and ammunition as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Clinton HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Alvin PennCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Robert BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API