Legal Opinion

Resh, Inc v. Skimlite Manufacturing Inc

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 7, 2023No. 5:22-cv-01427Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RESH, INC, Case No. 5:22-cv-01427-EJD 9 Plaintiff, CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER v. 10 11 ROBERT CONRAD, INC. d/b/a SKIMLITE MANUFACTURING, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Resh, Inc. brings this suit against Defendants Robert Conrad, Inc., d/b/a Skimlite 14 Manufacturing; James R. Conrad; and Barrett R. Conrad for infringement of

U.S. Patent No. 15

11,141,852, entitled “Telepole Apparatus and Related Methods.” The parties dispute the 16 construction of eight terms. After considering the intrinsic and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API