Legal Opinion

Federated Capital Corporation v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 21, 2018No. 20140681-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christiansen, Judge:

¶1 Two of the three contentions presented in this case are identical to those we address in two factually similar cases also issued today. In Federated Capital Corp. v. Abraham , 2018 UT App 117 , 428 P.3d 21 , we concluded that the appellant waived any objection to the adequacy with which the appellee pleaded a statute-of-limitations defense. And in Federated Capital Corp. v. Deutsch , 2018 UT App 118 , 428 P.3d 51 , we concluded that the appellant had not presented to the district court the issue raised on appeal, and we consequently deemed the issue unpreserved. In the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  2. Federated Capital Corp. v. LibbyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Federated Capital Corp. v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. Federated Capital Corporation v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Jesse Rodney Dansie Living TrustCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bad Ass Coffee v. Royal AlohaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. Pyper v. ReilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. Yuanzong Fu v. RhodesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Big Game Forever v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  5. Office of Professional Conduct v. BernacchiUtah Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API