Legal Opinion
ADM Investor Services, Inc. v. Ramsay
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 9, 2008No. 06 C 6539PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Introduction
ADM Investor Services, Inc. (“ADM”) has sued Thomas Ramsay (“Ramsay”), seeking to recover a deficit balance in Ramsay’s commodity futures account that existed when ADM closed out that account. ADM has now moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, its motion is granted and the other surviving claim (brought by Ramsay against third party defendant Texas Trading Co., Inc. (“Texas Trading”)) is dismissed without prejudice.
Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Straits Fin. LLC v. Ten Sleep Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- In re MF Global Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Ten Sleep Cattle Co. v. Straits Financial LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Ten Sleep Cattle Co. v. Straits Financial LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018