Lauzon v. Bellemeumer
Michigan Supreme Court
' Error to Gogebic; Haire, J. Assumpsit by Bruno Lauzon against Paul Belleheumer for board and office rent. From' a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings-error.
Read the full summary
' Error to Gogebic; Haire, J. Assumpsit by Bruno Lauzon against Paul Belleheumer for board and office rent. From' a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings-error. The defendant was indebted to the plaintiff for board and office rent in the sum of $260.60; unless he is precluded from recovering by. the following agreement of settlement : “ Whereas, differences have arisen between Bruno Lauzon and A. Lauzon and P. E. Belleheumer, touching certain alleged misconduct on the part of the said Belleheumer towards the said A. Lauzon: In consideration of the premises,…
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
(after stating the facts). The contract, in its express terms, covers the account for which this suit is brought. It is, however, insisted on behalf of the plaintiff, that the account for board and rent was not intended to be settled by this agreement, but only the insult which it is claimed was offered by the defendant to plaintiff’s wife. Plaintiff testified that, in the negotiation pending this agreement, nothing was said about this ■account, and it is urged that he had the right to submit to the jury the question of fraud in its execution. Plaintiff testified to no false representations.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pratt v. CastleMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Houston v. TrowerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Booth Fisheries Co. v. Alpena Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Brevoort v. PartridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Erkiletian v. DevletianMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- General Discount Corp. v. SchramDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.