Vidal v. Stahmann Farms
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
Plaintiff below (Stahmann Farms), a copartnership, recovered judgment for $13,064.52 against the appellant (defendant below), in the District Court of the United States for the-District of New Mexico, al- ■ leged to have been paid as taxes under the so-called Bankhead Cotton Act, Act of April 21, 1934, c. 157, 48 Stat. 598, 7 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-725 notes: The defendant appeals. Two questions are briefed and argued: (1) Is the plaintiff the proper party to maintain this action; (2) is the so-called Bank-head Cotton Act, supra, constitutional.
A jury trial was waived and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Little v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stahmann v. VidalSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rocha v. RochaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956