Legal Opinion

MediGrow LLC v. Natalie M LaPrade Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 16, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00504Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MEDIGROW, LLC, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil Action No. RDB-20-0504 NATALIE M. LAPRADE * MEDICAL CANNABIS COMMISSION, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION The Federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), 21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq., prohibits the possession and distribution of marijuana, which is defined to include “all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L.” 21 U.S.C. § 802(16). Notwithstanding the illegality of marijuana under federal law, Maryland and several other states have recently permitted the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API