Trilogy Communications, Inc. v. Times Fiber Communications, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WINGATE, J.

Before the court is the motion of the plaintiff Trilogy Communications, Inc., (hereinafter “Trilogy”) for judgment as a matter of law with regard to the defendants’ state law counterclaims of malicious prosecution and unfair competition. Brought on day two in a jury trial between the parties, after defendants had rested on their case-in-chief, Trilogy’s motion is governed by Rule 50 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Trilogy argues that judgment as a matter of law is appropriate in the instant case because the evidence presented by Times Fiber…