Legal Opinion
Angel Lopez-Valenzuela v. County of Maricopa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2013No. 11-16487PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
In 2006, Arizona voters overwhelmingly approved an amendment to their state constitution known as “Proposition 100.” It commands that Arizona state courts may not set bail “[f]or serious felony offenses as prescribed by the legislature if the person charged has entered or remained in the United States illegally and if the proof is evident or the presumption great as to the present charge.” Ariz. Const, art. II, § 22(A)(4) (as amended). Felony arrestee plaintiffs Angel Lopez-Valenzuela and Isaac Castro-Armenta filed a class action in the United States District…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Experience Hendrix L.L.C. v. Hendrixlicensing.com Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Angel Lopez-Valenzuela v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- James MacIel, Sr. v. Matthew CatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Experience Hendrix LLC v. Hendrixlicensing.Com Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Experience Hendrix L.L.C. v. Hendrixlicensing.com Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.