Richardson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
We must decide under the circumstances of this case whether the prosecuting witness was justifiably held in contempt for refusing to testify after asserting his privilege against self incrimination.
On March 23, 1978, before the Circuit Court for Queen Anne’s County, Paul Edward Richardson, appellant, was called as the prosecuting witness in the trial of James Copper, who was charged with assault with intent to murder the appellant. After taking the stand and being duly sworn, appellant gave his name, address, and age. He then acknowledged that he knew Copper, but when asked by the State’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- United States v. Gerald N. KlauberCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- In Re Criminal Investigation No. 1-162Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Choi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Webster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.