Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Haddox v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 2000No. 98-961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Wage loss is “the difference between the employee’s present earnings and the greater of the employee’s full weekly wage or average weekly wage.” Former Ohio Adm.Code 4121-3-32(A)(5), 1987-1988 OMR 64. Where a claimant “suffers a wage loss as a result of returning to employment other than his former position of employment * * *, he shall receive compensation at sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of his weekly wage loss.” R.C. 4123.56(B).
R.C. 4123.56(B) requires a showing of both actual wage loss and a causal relationship between the allowed condition and the wage loss. State ex rel. Watts v.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Bos v. Navistar International Transportational Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Haddox v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. City of Middleburg Heights v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- OHA: The Assn. for hosp. & Health Sys. v. Ohio Dept. of Human Serv.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Oha v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.