Legal Opinion

United States v. Cope

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 8, 1956No. Cr. Nos. 2240, 19209, 19216, 19225PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. JASPER SMITH, District Judge.

Defendant-petitioner presents a motion to vacate sentence and judgment under Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. In support of his motion, petitioner urges nine contentions. In the beginning it should be observed that the sentence and judgment complained of was pronounced by my predecessor in office, and that I had no opportunity to observe this defendant in Court.

In the first of these “contentions” petitioner states that “his plea was based on a forced admission by means of a fraud, promises, and threats, all of which resulted in a coerced and involuntary plea of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ernest Eugene Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  2. United States v. SturmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James P. Taylor v. United States of America, James Peter Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. State v. ForeOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Dolack v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1963
  4. United States v. ScherkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  5. Potter v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API