Legal Opinion
Poyson v. Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 2013No. 10-99005PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Judge Thomas has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Fisher has so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en bane. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the'matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).
Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, filed April 12, 2013, is DENIED.
Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing, filed April 12, 2013, remains…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Roger Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Robert Poyson v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Roger Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.