Stephens v. City Council of Augusta

Bell, Justice.

1. While the ordinance purported to confer certain powers on the barber board, including- the .power- of inspection, which if exercised might result in physical interference with the plaintiff’s business, ' the petition did not show that any of such powers had been exercised or attempted, and did not otherwise state a cause of action based on interference or threatened interferénee by such board. Flint v. Augusta, 192 Ga. 318 (14 S. E. 2d, 859). The case differs on its facts from Walker v. Carrollton, 187 Ga. 237 (200 S. E. 268), in which the petition contained averments as to…