Legal Opinion

Arcelia V. v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 28, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01830Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARCELIA V., Case No.: 25-cv-1830-SBC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AFFIRMING FINAL 13 v. DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, SECURITY 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 17, 2025, Plaintiff Arcelia V.1 initiated this action against Defendant 18 Commissioner of Social Security for judicial review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the denial 19 of her applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. 20 (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendant filed the Administrative Record on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Debbra Hill v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API