Legal Opinion
Security Pacific National Bank v. Adamo
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1983No. Civ. 65354PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, Acting P. J.
In this action on a promissory note and guaranties, six of the defendants appeal from summary judgment entered against them and in favor of plaintiff.1 Appellants mount virtually no attack on the judgment, the primary purpose of the appeal apparently being to secure review of an order denying their motion for leave to file a fourth amended cross-complaint.
On January 11, 1980, Security Pacific National Bank commenced an action to collect an unsecured promissory note in the principal sum of $340,000 *495payable October 12, 1979, made by a corporation and payment of which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Genis v. KrasneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Gonzales v. R. J. Novick Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Abdallah v. United Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. v. B. Peter Brown and David F. RidingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Velasquez v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.