Legal Opinion

Verland Oil & Gas Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1924No. 13456PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff Walker was in the possession of, and occupying but not under valid lease, about 2,000 acres of Indian grass land in the Osage Nation on which he ranged about 300 steers. Defendant oil company drilled one producing well and was. in process of drilling another under a valid lease for such purpose on the same real estate. Elm creek was near such producing well. During a portion of the year the water flowed in such creek and the remainder of the year it stood in holes from which the plaintiff’s cattle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. of America v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Spencer v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Marland Oil Co. v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Midland Oil Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Kewanee Oil & Gas Co. v. MosshamerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  5. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API