Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1977No. 1699PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COULSON, Justice.

This is an appeal based on the trial court’s refusal to allow the appellants to open and close the jury argument. While we agree that this was error, we find that it was harmless and affirm.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Bell) initiated eminent domain proceedings against land belonging to Mr. and Mrs. Jimmy Phillips, Jr. (the Phillips) to acquire an easement through it. The County Court at Law appointed commissioners who, after a hearing, awarded the Phillips $665.00. The Phillips appealed to the county court. Although the Phillips contested Bell’s power to condemn, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Teague v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Wagoner v. City of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Seureau v. MuddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Hassell v. PrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Western Fire Insurance Company v. ReynaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Religious of the Sacred Heart of Texas v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Collin County v. Hixon Family Partnership, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  3. Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Francis v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API