Legal Opinion
John W. Frandsen v. Westinghouse Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1995No. 93-4154PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN BEBBER, District Judge.
Plaintiff John W. Frandsen appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant Westinghouse Corporation on the basis of issue preclusion resulting from other litigation. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
I. Background
Plaintiff-appellant John W. Frandsen, an electrician, alleges that he suffered serious injuries while performing electrical installation work at a construction project in Nevada. The injuries occurred when he was testing the voltage on an electrical panel board by inserting an insulated metal…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Missouri v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Carper v. DeLandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Moss v. KoppCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Phillips Usa, Inc. v. Allflex Usa, Inc., and N.J. Phillips Pty., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- In Re John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. Gledhill, Debtors, State Bank of Southern Utah v. John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. GledhillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Dominion Video Satellite, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.