Legal Opinion

Barling v. Bank of British North America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the Northern District of California. At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

Deady, District Judge.

On April 5, 1888, the Alaska Improvement Company, a corporation formed under the laws of California, drew three bills of exchange on William T. Coleman & Co., citizens of the state of California, payable to itself, the first two in 60 days, and the third in 90 days, after date, for the sum of $2,740, $2,500, and $4,000, respectively, and on the same day indorsed the same in blank, and, before maturity thereof, transferred and delivered the same to said Coleman & Co., who subsequently, and before maturity thereof, in consideration of the amount of the face of said bills,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Bullard v. BellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1817
  3. Irving National Bank v. . AlleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Ferry v. King CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Phelps v. O'Brien CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · 1873

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Blaine CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  2. Wahl v. FranzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Weinstock v. SinatraDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1974
  4. Baron & Co., Inc. v. Bank of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  5. Groton Bridge & Mfg. Co. v. American Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API