Legal Opinion
Jacobsen v. City of Rathdrum
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1988No. 16901Published
1Opinion of the Court
766 P.2d 736 (1988)
115 Idaho 266
Dustin JACOBSEN, a minor child; and Judy L. Hamlin, a single woman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF RATHDRUM, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 16901.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
September 12, 1988.
Sims, Liesche & Newell, P.A., Coeur d' Alene, for plaintiffs-appellants. W. Corey Cartwright argued.
Hull, Hull & Branstetter, Wallace, for defendant-respondent. Michael K. Branstetter argued.
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a personal injury case. The primary issue is whether I.C. § 36-1604, Idaho's recreational use statute (the recreational use statute), precludes a claim on behalf of…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ferres v. City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Leland J. Seyler and Aileene Seyler, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Huyck v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Elbert v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.