Legal Opinion
Good Neighbor Federation v. Pathe Industries, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrank, J.
The problem posed here is the disposition of a cross complaint by the defendant Pathe Industries, Inc., against the defendant Diesel Electric Company following the rendition of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff against both defendants. By stipulation, the determination of the cross complaint was left to the court. The plaintiff sought to recover damages against both these defendants and a third defendant, MacArthur, for negligence. For convenience, the parties will be referred to by the first word in their respective names.
The defendant Pathe was the owner of property, adjacent to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thompson-Starrett Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Tipaldi v. Riverside Memorial Chapel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Walters v. Rao Electrical Equipment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Priolo v. Lefferts General Hospital, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Good Neighbor Federation v. Pathe Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Harrington v. 615 West Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956