Legal Opinion

Dillingham v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1999No. 98-SC-428-MR, 98-SC-429-MRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

Appellants, Kenneth Ray Dillingham and Robert Jurell Hicks, were convicted respectively of first-degree robbery and complicity to first-degree robbery. Dill-ingham and Hicks were sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. We affirm both convictions and Dillingham’s sentence. However, because palpable error was committed during the sentencing phase of Hicks’s trial, we reverse his sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing.

The Edmonton State Bank in Center, Kentucky, was robbed at 11:30 a.m. on December 1, 1997. A neatly-dressed man walked into the bank and handed a note…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. BenhamKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Partin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Willie Arthur Thigpen v. Duane CoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Thompson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Davenport v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Parker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API