Legal Opinion

Key Caisee Corp. v. Seashore Shell Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 11, 1985No. Nos. 84-2644, 84-2645PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court found that service upon an employee of an attorney was valid service on the appellant corporation. The attorney was the designated resident agent of the appellant corporation and his office had been designated as the corporate office. The employee was served at the attorney’s office between the hours of 10 A.M. to 12 noon on a normal working day.1

The trial court also appointed a receiver to facilitate the accomplishment of the purposes of a partnership. Among oth*793er things, it empowered the receiver to arrange financing in order to continue the operation of the partnership and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. HawleySupreme Court of Florida · 1855
  2. State Ex Rel. Woods-Young Co. v. TedderSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Arison Shipping Company v. Klosters Rederi A/SDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Karafilakis v. StavroulakisSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Puma Enterprises Corp. v. VitaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Kosow v. KovensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API