Legal Opinion

Puma Enterprises Corp. v. Vitale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1990No. 90-909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

566 So.2d 1343 (1990)

PUMA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

Gerard M. VITALE, Etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 90-909.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 11, 1990.

Rehearing Denied October 12, 1990.

Buchbinder & Elegant, and Carolina A. Echarte, Miami, for appellant.

Michel Ociacovski Weisz, Miami, for appellees.

Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.

2Per curiam

The defendant, Puma Enterprises Corporation [Puma], appeals from the entry of a non-final order appointing a receiver without notice and a non-final order denying Puma's emergency motion to partially vacate the expanded…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Belk's Dept. Store, Miami, Inc. v. SchermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Apalachicola Northern Railroad Co. v. SommersSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Welch v. Gray Moss Bondholders Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. J. G. White Engineering Corp. v. Peoples State Bank of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Abramson v. BrantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hopping v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Barnett Bank v. SteinbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Metro-Dade Investments, Co. v. Granada Lakes Villas Condominium, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. JKM Servs., LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. CramerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API