Legal Opinion
Cynthia Lucero v. Walmart, Inc., Walmart Associates, Inc., Walmart Store No. 3428, and John Does 1-10
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided May 19, 2026No. 1:25-cv-00870Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CYNTHIA LUCERO, Plaintiff, v. No. 25-cv-00870 WALMART, INC., WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC., WALMART STORE NO. 3428, AND JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO PRODUCE ADEQUATELY PREPARED RULE 30(b)(6) DESIGNEE Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Adequately Prepared Rule 30(b)(6) Designee. Doc. 62. Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Defendants “to produce a supplemental corporate representative to testify on noticed Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr., and Gwen G. Caranchini v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- ECCLESIASTES 9: 10-11-12, INC. v. LMC Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.