State v. Hofmann
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
After a bench trial, appellant Timothy Joseph Hofmann was convicted of second-degree burglary, theft, and first-degree criminal damage to property. Hofmann now challenges those convictions, claiming that the victims’ burglarized motor home was not a “building” within the meaning of the burglary statute and that the trial court erred in admitting for impeachment purposes evidence of his prior convictions. We affirm.
ISSUES. 1. Was the motor home a “building” for purposes of the burglary statute?
2. Did the trial court commit reversible error in admitting for impeachment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. LloydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. SwingerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Estate of PalmenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Estate of PalmenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2016