Legal Opinion

Cenex, Inc., (Formerly Known as Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc.,) and Subsidiaries v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 9, 1998No. 98-5046PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Chief Judge.

Cenex, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, No. 92-CV-97, which granted the United States’ motion for summary judgment that losses associated with Cenex’s investment in Energy Cooperative, Inc. are capital losses and that Cenex’s payments to Northern Tier Pipeline Company for shutdown costs were contributions to capital that deserve capital loss treatment. Because the court correctly characterized these losses as capital ones, we affirm.

Background

Cenex, Inc. is an agricultural cooperative corporation that sells, inter alia, petroleum…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Arkansas Best Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Roth Steel Tube Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Barsebäck Kraft AB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. The United States. The Evening News Association v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Imprimis Investors LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. The Xerxe Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Taha v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  5. In re Ruff Financial Services, Inc.; Segal v. LedyardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API