Legal Opinion

Comstock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 26, 2001No. WD 59475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.

Nicholas Comstock appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035, contending that, pursuant to Rule 24.02, the plea court should have informed him that the court was rejecting the plea recommendation made pursuant to an agreement, and that his counsel was ineffective in failing to move to withdraw his plea.

Comstock was charged by information with two counts of statutory rape in the first degree. On January 7, 2000, Com-stock entered into an agreement to plead guilty. In return for the guilty plea, the State agreed to recommend a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schellert v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Sams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State v. SimpsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Winegar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Cross v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Dennis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API