Legal Opinion
Winegar v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 1998No. WD 54209PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITH, Presiding Judge.
Stephen P. Winegar appeals the motion court’s denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He alleges that his guilty plea was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, or intelligently because he was misled by counsel into believing that, in exchange for his plea of guilty, he would be sentenced to probation and allowed to serve that probation in California. Mr. Winegar now claims that his probation officer refused to let him leave Missouri. We find that the motion court did not err in holding that Mr. Winegar did not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Davis v. PurkettDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
- Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Coke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Miller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.