Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lehmkuhl

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2013No. 2012-1719PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Phillip Douglas Lehmkuhl of Mount Vernon, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0021246, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1978.

{¶ 2} In a December 5, 2011 complaint, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Lehmkuhl with professional misconduct based on (1) his failure to conduct an investigation to identify the proper party-defendants before filing a defamation action, (2) his failure to timely amend his complaint when he learned that he had erroneously filed suit against the daughter of the intended defendants, and (3) his failure to respond to the ensuing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. GalloOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Akron Bar Assn. v. FinkOhio Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klan v. Med. Radiologists, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API