Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1978No. Appeals, Nos. 1901, 2327 and 2328 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

These are petitions for review filed by Michael D. Hayes, Marguerite Cackley, and Deby Doloff (Claimants), from the denial of their individual applications for unemployment compensation benefits. The Bureau of Employment Security denied benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e). Upon appeal and after *51separate hearings, separate referees affirmed the decision of the local Bureau and disallowed the claim for benefits. Thereafter, the Unemployment Compensation Board of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. ThomasCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Romanovich v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rebel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. DiGiovanni v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. McDermott v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Laws v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API