Dynamo v. Brown Auto Hospital, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.
Plaintiff sued for work, labor and services performed and materials furnished. The plaintiff annexed to its complaint a list of items numbered “ 1 ” to “ 24,” in compliance with section 255-a of the Civil Practice Act. The defendant, in its answer, set forth first a general denial. Defendant then specifically *868denied items 1, 2 and 3. Defendant then specifically denied, “ upon information sufficient to form a belief,” items 5 to 20, inclusive. Defendant then specifically denied in paragraph “ Sixth ” of its answer, items 21 to 24, inclusive, although not referring to the numbers. Defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Innis, Pearce & Co. v. G. H. Poppenberg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- International Milk Co. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927