Legal Opinion

Price v. Baldauf

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 1, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from MahasJca District Court. — Hon. D. Ryan,. Judge. Action in equity for a mandatory injunction. There was a hearing on the merits, and a decree from which plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In the year 1874, Henry Price and Boyer & Barnes owned adjoining lots in the city of Oskaloosa. Each was one hundred and twenty feet in length from east to west; that of Price was twenty feet wide, and that of Boyer & Barnes was twenty-eight feet wide, and north of that of Price. The owners *206proposed to improve their respective lots, and, with that in view, entered into an agreement, in writing, of which the following is a copy:

“This agreement,- made and entered into by and between Boyer & Barnes of the first part, and Henry Price of the second part, witnesseth: That party of the first part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago Lumber Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. Berry v. KritenbrinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Akron Ambulance Service, Inc. v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API