Legal Opinion

Wakem v. Inhabitants of Van Buren

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 24, 1940PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorster, J.

On report, on an agreed statement of facts. This is an action of assumpsit brought by the receiver of The Caribou National Bank against the Inhabitants of the town of Van Burén, on its promissory note given to said bank. The defendant contends that this action cannot be maintained because the loan for which the note was given was, and is in excess of the constitutional debt limit of that town; and that, even if it once had validity as a temporary loan in anticipation of taxes, yet at the time the action was brought, it could not have been, and cannot now be considered as falling within any…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Law v. People ex rel. HuckIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. City of Springfield v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. City of CorrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. City of Wichita Falls Ex Rel. L. E. Whitham & Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CrommettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  2. Moores v. Inhabitants of SpringfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  3. Realco Services, Inc. v. HalperinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Allen v. QuinnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. Allen v. QuinnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API