Kawasaki v. Kasting
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The court’s award of 65% of the undivided marital assets to the husband and 35% to the wife is amply supported by the record. This was a childless marriage of some 10 years’ duration. The husband’s earnings comprised about 81% of the *1035family income. Each party made significant nonmonetary contributions toward maintenance of marital property and their horse business and each is capable of financial self-support. The court also directed that the husband be responsible for 65% of the marital debts. There is no general requirement that assets be divided equally (Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arvantides v. ArvantidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Kobylack v. KobylackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Michalek v. MichalekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Kobylack v. KobylackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Thayer v. BlandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Butler v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Sheenagh O'R. v. Sean F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Sherry G. v. George F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. Van Dyne, New York County Courts1998
- People v. Owens, New York County Courts1999