Legal Opinion

Town of Leeds v. Sharp

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1928No. 6 Div. 962PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This bill was filed by appellants against appellee seeking injunctive relief against the diversion of the use of the property therein described as a public park to private purposes. The equity of bills of this character is well recognized. Hill v. Houk, 155 Ala. 448, 46 So. 562.

Complainants insist the property had been dedicated to the public and particularly to the town of Leeds, within the corporate limits of which it is situated. Respondent, on the other hand, claims the property as his own and denies there has been any dedication. The question of dedication vel non was therefore the issue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoole v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. East Birmingham Realty Co. v. Birmingham Machine & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Manning v. HouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Stack v. Tennessee Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. City of Florence v. Florence Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Nixon v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Stringer Realty Co. v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Capella v. Carreras MárquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1935
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. HulganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API